不同躯干约束下蹲姿对人体下肢运动学和动力学的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

2022年国家级大学生创新创业项目(202210112019)


Effects of Different Trunk-Restraint Squatting Positions on Human Lower Limb Kinematics and Dynamics
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探究躯干控制对青年群体亚洲蹲和西方蹲时下肢运动生物力学特征的影响,为深蹲训练的应用和推广提供实证性依据。方法 24名健康男性青年大学生在带杆、无杆控制条件下进行亚洲蹲和西方蹲,运用红外光点运动捕捉系统和三维测力台采集其下肢运动学和动力学特征。通过Cortex-642.6.2软件,根据欧拉角的方法计算获得下肢三维角度,运用逆动力学方法得到三维力矩。通过2×2重复设计的双因素方差分析检验躯干控制和深蹲姿势对下肢运动特征的影响。结果 躯干控制和深蹲姿势对运动学和动力学参数均无显著性交互作用(P>0.05)。西方蹲具有较大的膝关节屈曲角、髌股关节接触力峰值、髋膝伸展力矩峰值之比,较小的踝关节背屈角、髋关节屈曲角(P<0.05)。带杆深蹲具有较大的踝关节背屈角、髌股关节接触力峰值和髋关节屈曲角,较小的膝关节屈曲角、髋膝伸展力矩峰值之比(P<0.05)。结论 西方蹲有助于训练伸髋肌群肌力,亚洲蹲则有助于训练伸膝肌群肌力。西方蹲髌股关节接触力峰值显著大于亚洲蹲,故推荐髌股关节痛患者采用亚洲蹲。带杆深蹲可补偿人体平衡,建议由于踝关节背屈活动范围受限或胫骨前肌无力人群可以考虑进行带杆深蹲等躯干控制训练,有助于帮助提高深蹲时下肢稳定性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the effect of trunk control on the biomechanical characteristics of lower-extremity movements during Asian squats (AS) and Western squats (WS) in young adults to provide empirical support for the application and promotion of deep squat training. Methods Twenty-four healthy young male collegiate students performed AS and WS with and without bar control, and their lower-extremity kinematic and kinetic characteristics were collected using an infrared light-point motion capture system and a three-dimensional (3D) dynamometer. The 3D angles of the lower extremities were obtained using Cortex-642.6.2 software, based on the calculation of Euler angles, and the 3D moments were obtained by applying the inverse dynamics method. The effects of trunk control and deep squatting posture on the lower-extremity kinematic characteristics were examined using a two-factor analysis of variance with a 2 × 2 repeated design. Results There was no significant interaction between trunk control and the deep squatting posture for either kinematic or kinetic parameters (P > 0.05). The WS group had a large knee flexion angle, peak patellofemoral contact force, and ratio of peak hip and knee extension moments, and small ankle dorsiflexion and hip flexion angles (P<0.05). The deep squat with a bar had a large ankle dorsiflexion angle, peak patellofemoral contact force, and hip flexion angle as well as a small knee flexion angle and ratio of peak hip and knee extension moments (P<0.05). Conclusions WS is helpful for training hip extension muscle groups, whereas AS is helpful for training knee extension muscle strength. The peak patellofemoral joint contact force of the WS is significantly greater than that of the AS; therefore, it is recommended that patients with patellofemoral joint pain use the AS. A squat with a bar can compensate for the body’s balance; thus, people with limited ankle dorsiflexion range of motion or anterior tibial muscle weakness may consider trunk control training, such as a deep squat with a bar. This may help improve lower-extremity stability during squats.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郝乐天,陈纪均,杨亦敏,赵麒,王萌,高境辰,张美珍.不同躯干约束下蹲姿对人体下肢运动学和动力学的影响[J].医用生物力学,2024,39(1):118-124

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-28
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭