新型与传统锁定加压接骨板固定股骨干骨折的生物力学比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Biomechanical Comparison of Novel and Traditional LCP Fixation for Femoral Shaft Fractures
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对比股骨干骨折治疗采用的新型与传统锁定加压接骨板(locking compression plate, LCP)的生物力学性能,为选择更有效的接骨板提供理论依据。方法 对接骨板进行弯曲强度与疲劳测试,再结合ANSYS Workbench对接骨板变形、应力及寿命进行有限元分析。结果 新型LCP平均弯曲屈服载荷与弯曲强度均为传统LCP的1.4倍,新型、传统LCP平均循环次数分别为106次与47 091次,使用寿命相差33.8%。结论 使用新型LCP固定股骨干骨折失效可能性小于传统LCP,新型LCP拥有更有效的生物力学稳定性。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare biomechanical properties of the traditional and novel locking compression plate (LCP) for treating femoral shaft fracture, so as to provide theoretical basis for selecting more effective bone plate. Methods The bending strength and fatigue tests on the plate were performed, and the finite element analysis on deformation, stress and life of the plate were conducted by using ANSYS Workbench. Results The average bending yield load and bending strength of the novel LCP were 1.4 times of that of the traditional LCP, and the average cycle times of the novel and traditional LCP were 106 and 47 091, respectively. The difference of service life for two LCPs was 33.8%. ConclusionsThe failure probability of the novel LCP is smaller than that of the traditional LCP, and the novel LCP has more effective biomechanical stability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李甜甜,李世芸,熊鹰,马勇,陈洪亮.新型与传统锁定加压接骨板固定股骨干骨折的生物力学比较[J].医用生物力学,2021,36(5):757-761

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-25
  • 最后修改日期:2020-11-13
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-10-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭