寰椎后路两种螺钉固定的解剖学测量和生物力学测试的对比研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Anatomy and Biomechanical Test Comparison between Fixation Techniques of Atlas Pedicle Screw and Fixation Techniques of Atlas Lateral Mass Screw
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对寰椎椎弓根螺钉和寰椎侧块螺钉两种固定方法进行解剖测量和生物力学测试的对比研究,为临床选择寰椎螺钉的固定方式提供依据。方法 用电子游标卡尺和量角器测量16套正常成年人寰椎新鲜标本的相关参数,包括寰椎侧块螺钉的最大进钉长度(L1)、侧块螺钉进钉点到寰椎后弓后缘的长度(L2)、椎弓根螺钉在寰椎侧块内部分的长度(L3)、椎弓根螺钉在寰椎后弓内的长度(L4)、寰椎椎弓根螺钉的最大进钉长度(L3+L4)、椎弓根螺钉和侧块螺钉的外倾角(αo)和上斜角(βo)等14项内容。进行寰椎单皮质和双皮质的椎弓根螺钉或侧块螺钉固定,测试比较其螺钉拔出强度和钉道长度。结果 L1为(25.01±0.23)mm、L2为(9.85±1.31)mm、L3为(19.58±1.63)mm、L4为(10.47±1.51)mm、L3+L4为(29.81±1.27)mm、椎弓根螺钉和侧块螺钉的外倾角(αo)和上斜角(βo)分别为10o、5o和15o、20o。双皮质寰椎椎弓根螺钉的最大拔出力为(1686.0±425.3)N,单皮质寰椎椎弓根螺钉为(1082.5±292.7)N;双皮质寰椎侧块螺钉最大拔出力为(1127.2±367.1)N,与单皮质寰椎椎弓根螺钉无明显差异,单皮质寰椎侧块螺钉最小,为(785.2±402.7)N。结论 由于寰椎椎弓根螺钉和寰椎侧块螺钉进钉点的位置不同,使得寰椎椎弓根螺钉的长度较寰椎侧块螺钉要长。寰椎侧块螺钉的长度大于寰椎椎弓根螺钉在寰椎侧块内部分的长度,是因为寰椎侧块螺钉的上斜角度和外倾角度均较大之故。在同时适用寰椎椎弓根螺钉和寰椎侧块螺钉固定的患者,从手术操作和螺钉固定强度考虑,宜首先选择寰椎椎弓根螺钉固定,次选寰椎侧块螺钉固定。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the anatomy and biomechanical test difference between atlas pedicle screw and atlas lateral mass screw, and provide theoretical basis for reasonable clinical choice of the posterior atlas screw fixation technique. Methods The relative parameters of sixteen sets of fresh Chinese adults' atlas specimens were measured with an digital caliper and a goniometer, including The mean maximum length of C1 lateral mass screw (L1)、the distance from its entry point to posterio redge of C1 posterior arch (L2)、in the lateral mass of C1 (L3)、in the posterior arch (L4) and the averaged maximum length of C1 pedicle screw (L3+L4) and so on. The extraversion and upslope angle of atlas pedicle screw and atlas lateral mass screw. The unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screw or pedicle screw were placed on atlas in sixteen fresh spine specimens separately. The length and the pull-out strength of the screw were measured and tested. Results The mean maximum length of C1 lateral mass screw (L1) was 25.01±0.23mm, the distance from its entry point to posterio redge of C1 posterior arch was (L2) 9.85±1.31mm. The averaged maximum length of C1 pedicle screw (L3+L4)was 29.8±1.27mm, 10.47±1.51mm was in the posterior arch (L4), 19.58±1.63mm was in the lateral mass of C1 (L3). The extraversion and upslope angle of atlas pedicle screw and atlas lateral mass screw was respectively 10o, 5o and 15o, 20o. Atlas bicortical pedicle screw was the strongest fixation method. Its pull-out strength averaged (1686.0±425.3) N. No statistically significant difference was observed between atlas unicortical pedicle screw (1082.5±292.7)N and atlas bicortical lateral mass screw (1127.2±367.1)N. atlas unicortical lateral mass screw (785.2±402.7)N was the weakest fixation technique. Conclusion Because of difference entry point between atlas pedicle screw and atlas lateral mass screw, atlas pedicle screw was longer than atlas lateral mass screw. Due to the extraversion and upslope angle of atlas lateral mass screw was bigger than atlas pedicle screw, length of atlas lateral mass screw was longer than in the lateral mass of atlas pedicle screw. In a giving patient, it would be better to choose C1 pedicle screw than C1 lateral mass screw, if he or she is suitable for both techniques.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡勇,谢辉,杨述华,徐荣明,马维虎,阮永平.寰椎后路两种螺钉固定的解剖学测量和生物力学测试的对比研究[J].医用生物力学,2007,22(1):88-93

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭