三种固定方法在颅骨骨瓣回复固定模型中生物力学评价的实验研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Experimental study of cranial flap fixation techniques on biomechanical evaluation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的对三种骨瓣固定方法在颅骨骨瓣回复固定模型中的生物力学性能进行比较、评价。方法6个颅骨标本共制备24个骨瓣,分为三组,分别采用丝线、不锈钢丝和颅骨固定钉三种方法固定,就操作时间、初始移位、垂直受力试验及最大承受力等方面进行比较。结果颅骨固定钉组的操作时间最短(94±13)s,初始移位最小(0.20±0.12)mm,最大承受力最大(385.4±63.1)N均明显优于不锈钢丝组和丝线组。结论颅骨固定钉操作简便快速,具有良好的复位效果及较大的强度,是较理想的颅骨固定装置。

    Abstract:

    Objective To study the techniques of cranial flap fixation (suture.stainless steel wire and rivet-like titanium clamp). Methods 24 cadaver craniotomy flaps were divided into three groups, then every eight flaps were reattached with sutures.stainless steel wires and rivet-like titanium clamps respectively. Bone flap fixation was timed and measured for offset with craniotomied skull for every fixation technique, load-bearing tests were performed by applying an external force until failure of the fixation system. The results were compared. Results Rivet-like titanium clamp required signifi cantly less time (94±13)s to fix than either suture (172±14)s or stainless steel wire (399±45)s. Rivet-like titanium clamp also showed significantly smaller offset (0.20±0.12)mm than either suture (2.20±0.24)mm or stainless steel wire (1.32±0.34)mm. Rivet-like titanium clamp was stronger than suture and stainless steel wire. Conclusion Rivet-like titanium clamp is ease to use, require less time consumption, and show accuracy and strength.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

苏志鹏,杨树旭,王义荣.三种固定方法在颅骨骨瓣回复固定模型中生物力学评价的实验研究[J].医用生物力学,2005,20(3):173-176

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭