膝关节骨软骨缺损尺寸对周围软骨和缺损边缘应力分布的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

北京大学第三医院运动医学科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effect of knee osteochondral defect size on stress distribution in the surrounding cartilage and defect rim
Author:
Affiliation:

Peking University Third Hospital, Department of Sports Medicine

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:探究单发膝关节骨软骨缺损(Osteochondral Defect, OCD)对股骨内侧髁负重区应力分布的影响,并进一步评估内侧髁所受最大压强点随着缺损尺寸出现而发生的改变。 方法:10只新鲜猪膝关节固定于完全伸直位,通过对猪膝关节内侧间室进行力学加载确定最大接触压强区域,在该区域分别钻取不同直径的圆形骨软骨缺损(深度9.0 mm),并分别对每只猪膝关节在内侧间室施加100.0 N、200.0 N和300.0 N的轴向压缩载荷,分别记录加载过程中的峰值接触压强的强度及部位。 结果:峰值压强随缺损尺寸的增加而升高,并出现应力集中现象。缺损直径≥8.0 mm时峰值压强显著高于无缺损膝关节(当施加300.0 N力时,8.0 mm缺损 VS. 无缺损,1.526 ± 0.1218 MPa VS. 1.330 ± 0.0793 MPa,P = 0.0113)。此外,峰值压强表现出随缺损尺寸增大而更靠近缺损边缘的现象(峰值压强位置距缺损边缘的距离(峰-边距):当施加300.0 N力时,8.0 mm缺损 VS. 4.0 mm 缺损,3.178 ± 0.1373 mm VS. 3.903 ± 0.1545 mm,P<0.0001)。 结论:在单发膝关节骨软骨缺损模型中,当承重部位缺损直径≥8.0 mm时,未损伤部位所受的压强峰值显著升高,且压强峰值位置距缺损边缘的距离显著减小,可能是需行手术干预的潜在阈值。

    Abstract:

    Objective: To investigate the effect of single Osteochondral Defect (OCD) of the knee on the pressure distribution in the weight-bearing area of the medial femoral condyle, and to further evaluate the changes of the location of peak pressure on the medial condyle with the size of the defect. Methods: 10 fresh porcine knee joints were fixed in extension position. First, mechanical loads were applied to the medial compartment of the normal pig knee joint to determine the maximum contact pressure area. Then, osteochondral defects of different diameter in depth of 9 mm were drilled at this area, respectively. Axial compression loads of 100.0 N, 200.0 N, and 300.0 N were applied to the medial compartment of each knee joint, and the strength and location of the peak contact pressure during loading were recorded. Results: The peak pressure increased with increasing defect size, and showing stress concentration. The peak pressure was significantly higher in the defect diameter ≥8.0 mm than in the non-defect knee (When 300.0 N pressure was applied, 8.0 mm defect VS. no defect, 1.526 ± 0.1218 MPa VS. 1.330 ± 0.0793 MPa, P = 0.0113). In addition, the peak pressure showed a similar tendency to move closer to the defect rim as the defect size increased (the distance between the peak pressure position and the defect rim (peak-to-rim distance): when 300.0 N pressure was applied, 8.0 mm defect VS. 4.0 mm defect, 3.178 ± 0.1373 mm VS. 3.903 ± 0.1545 mm, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: In the single knee osteochondral defect model, when the diameter of the defect at the bear-loading zone was ≥8.0 mm, the peak pressure on the uninjured site significantly increased, and peak-to-rim distance significantly decreased, which implied 8.0 mm as a potential threshold for surgical intervention.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-06
  • 最后修改日期:2025-01-24
  • 录用日期:2025-01-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭