杆状和片状三周期极小曲面模型孔隙特征与力学性能对比
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52075324)


Comparative Study on Pore Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Solid and Sheet TPMS Models
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 分析对比杆状与片状三周期极小曲面(triply periodic minimal surface, TPMS)模型孔隙特征与力学性能,构建高比表面积、低刚度和高强度的多孔结构。方法 构建相同孔隙率的D、G、P 3种单元杆状TPMS与片状TPMS模型,对比模型的孔径、杆径、比表面积等孔隙特征;利用有限元方法分析模型的力学性能;采用增材制造技术制作多孔钛样件,利用显微镜和扫描电镜观测多孔钛孔隙特征,通过压缩试验检测多孔钛力学性能。结果 同种单元片状结构的比表面积均显著高于杆状结构,同种单元片状结构的力学性能明显优于杆状结构。其中,D单元片状TPMS模型的优势最显著,比表面积为13.00 mm-1,多孔钛样件的弹性模量、屈服强度和抗压强度分别为(5.65±0.08) GPa、(181.03±1.30) MPa和(239.83±0.45) MPa,比杆状多孔钛样件分别提高43.87%、55.08%和67.21%。结论 相同单元的片状TPMS模型在保留有多孔结构低刚度的同时,有更大的比表面积,更有利于细胞的黏附生长,其低刚度、更高强度的力学特性能有效降低应力遮挡,提供足够的力学支撑,是一种理想的骨缺损修复替代物孔隙结构模型。

    Abstract:

    Objective To analyze and compare pore characteristics and mechanical properties of models with solid and sheet triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures, and build a porous structure with high specific surface area, low stiffness and high strength. Methods The solid TPMS and sheet TPMS models of D, G, and P units with the same porosity were established, and pore characteristics of the model such as pore diameter, rod diameter and specific surface area were compared; mechanical properties of the model were analyzed by finite element method. The porous titanium samples were made by additive manufacturing technology, pore characteristics of porous titanium were observed by microscope and scanning electron microscope, and mechanical properties of porous titanium were detected by compression test. Results The specific surface area of the sheet structure with the same unit was significantly higher than that of the solid structure; mechanical properties of the sheet structure with the same were significantly better than those of the solid structure. Among them, the D unit sheet TPMS model had the most significant advantages, with the specific surface area of 13.00 mm-1, and the elastic modulus, yield strength and compressive strength of the sheet porous titanium sample were (5.65±0.08) GPa, (181.03±1.30) MPa and (239.83±0.45) MPa, respectively, which were 43.87%, 55.08% and 67.21% higher than those of the solid porous titanium sample. Conclusions While retaining low rigidity of the porous structure, the sheet TPMS model of the same unit has a larger specific surface area, which is beneficial for cell adhesion and growth, and its low stiffness and high strength mechanical properties can effectively reduce stress shielding and provide sufficient mechanical support. It is an ideal pore structure model for bone defect repair substitutes.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

秦嘉伟,熊胤泽,高芮宁,李祥.杆状和片状三周期极小曲面模型孔隙特征与力学性能对比[J].医用生物力学,2021,36(4):576-581

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-31
  • 最后修改日期:2020-09-19
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-08-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭